If you have received a cease and desist letter asserting trademark infringement, you may be feeling uncertain about your next steps. A cease and desist letter can be intimidating, but understanding its implications and how to respond can make a significant difference for your business. This article aims to provide you with an overview of what to expect, how to respond, and what considerations to keep in mind regarding trademark law.
A trademark cease and desist letter is a formal notice from a trademark owner alleging that your use of a particular mark is infringing upon their trademark rights. This could involve the unauthorized use of a federally registered trademark, a trademark registered with a state government, or an unregistered trademark in which the owner believes they have established trademark rights through their use of the mark in commerce. The letter typically demands that the infringing party stop using the allegedly infringing trademark, remove any infringing materials, and potentially provide compensation for damage they believe they have suffered as a result of the alleged infringement.
The trademark owner's goal in sending a cease and desist letter is to enforce their proprietary rights without immediately resorting to a lawsuit. If you are a business owner who has received such a letter, you must act quickly to evaluate the claims, as ignoring the demand could lead to further legal action or a lawsuit.
Trademark infringement occurs when a party uses a mark that is likely to cause confusion with a trademark owner’s mark or that causes actual consumer confusion between infringing party and the trademark owner. The infringing mark must be used in commerce in a manner that is likely to cause consumer confusion. This typically means that the mark is the same or similar and is used by the alleged infringer in connection with goods or services that are related to the trademark owner’s goods or services. Infringement can occur even if the marks or the goods and services are not identical.
Trademark rights can arise from both federal registration and common law rights through actual use in commerce. This means that a trademark owner with an unregistered trademark may still have enforceable rights, especially if they have been using the mark continuously for a substantial period of time that began prior to your use. Trademark infringement can be intentional or unintentional. The key consideration is whether the trademark use causes actual consumer confusion or is likely to cause consumer confusion with the trademark owner’s business and reputation.
To properly assert a claim of trademark infringement, the trademark owner must demonstrate that their trademark is valid, protectable, and that your use of the mark creates a likelihood of confusion with their trademark. The likelihood of confusion standard is central to trademark infringement analysis, and courts rely on several factors to make this determination, as articulated in In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 1361 (C.C.P.A. 1973) ("DuPont factors"). These factors include:
Both federal and state courts and the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) use these factors or a similar set of factors to determine whether there is an infringement. If the trademark owner can establish a likelihood of confusion, then you, as the alleged infringer, could be liable even if you were unaware that your activities infringed on someone else’s trademark rights.
The trademark owner who has suffered damage from the unauthorized use of their trademark may pursue legal action, including filing a complaint in state or federal court. Remedies that may be available include:
In some cases, the infringing party may negotiate a settlement and/or a license to use the trademark owner's mark, but this would depend on the willingness of the parties to come to an agreement.
Trademark disputes can be resolved through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, such as mediation or arbitration, which can provide a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to litigation. These methods allow the trademark owner and the infringing party to negotiate a mutually agreeable outcome with the help of a neutral third party, often avoiding the complexities and expenses of a federal lawsuit. Mediation, in particular, encourages open dialogue and may lead to creative solutions, such as licensing agreements, while arbitration offers a binding resolution that can be reached more quickly than a traditional court proceeding. Considering ADR as a tool resolving trademark disputes can save both parties significant time and money, potentially leading to a satisfactory resolution.
Ignoring a trademark cease and desist letter is a risky strategy due to the potential escalation to litigation. If you fail to respond, the trademark owner may escalate the situation by filing a complaint in state or federal court. This can lead to costly litigation, potential monetary damages, and even a court order requiring you to stop using the mark.
Trademark infringement occurs under federal law, specifically the Lanham Act, even if you were unaware of the trademark owner's rights. Acting recklessly or failing to ensure that your mark does not infringe the asserted mark could lead to significant liability. Furthermore, if the trademark owner proves that you acted in bad faith, you could also be liable for attorney's fees and other penalties.
To avoid trademark infringement, always conduct a thorough search of existing trademarks before adopting a new mark. This search should include registered trademarks and common law uses to ensure your mark is unique and not likely to cause confusion with an existing one. Additionally, evaluate whether your proposed mark may be similar to registered or unregistered marks in the same industry. If there is any uncertainty about the availability or strength of a proposed mark, it is probably time to consider modifying the mark or choosing a different mark.
A trademark attorney can help you understand the complexities of trademark law, including how trademarks are established, enforced, and protected under federal law. Whether you need to respond to a cease and desist letter, defend against claims of infringement, or explore options for a license or other settlement, having experienced legal counsel is essential.
It is important to note that cease and desist letters are often sent to assert claims before initiating formal legal action. How you respond can significantly affect the outcome of the case and your business's ability to continue using its mark. By consulting an attorney and developing a strategic response, you can mitigate the risks and protect your brand.
Receiving a trademark infringement letter can be daunting, but it is important not to panic. By understanding your rights, evaluating the allegations carefully, and promptly seeking appropriate legal counsel, you can make informed decisions about how to respond. Whether you choose to challenge the claims, negotiate a settlement, or cease the infringing activities, you should act promptly and strategically to protect your business and intellectual property.
For more information, contact our office for a free consultation with a trademark attorney who can guide you through the process.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
"Mark and William are stellar in the capabilities, work ethic, character, knowledge, responsiveness, and quality of work. Hubby and I are incredibly grateful for them as they've done a phenomenal job working tirelessly over a time span of at least five years on a series of patents for hubby. Grateful that Fresno has such amazing patent attorneys! They're second to none and they never disappoint. Thank you, Mark, William, and your entire team!!"
Linda Guzman
Sierra IP Law, PC - Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights
FRESNO
7030 N. Fruit Ave.
Suite 110
Fresno, CA 93711
(559) 436-3800 | phone
BAKERSFIELD
1925 G. Street
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(661) 200-7724 | phone
SAN LUIS OBISPO
956 Walnut Street, 2nd Floor
San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
(805) 275-0943 | phone
SACRAMENTO
180 Promenade Circle, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95834
(916) 209-8525 | phone
MODESTO
1300 10th St., Suite F.
Modesto, CA 95345
(209) 286-0069 | phone
SANTA BARBARA
414 Olive Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
(805) 275-0943 | phone
SAN MATEO
1650 Borel Place, Suite 216
San Mateo, CA, CA 94402
(650) 398-1644. | phone
STOCKTON
110 N. San Joaquin St., 2nd Floor
Stockton, CA 95202
(209) 286-0069 | phone
PORTLAND
425 NW 10th Ave., Suite 200
Portland, OR 97209
(503) 343-9983 | phone
TACOMA
1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 600
Tacoma, WA 98402
(253) 345-1545 | phone
KENNEWICK
1030 N Center Pkwy Suite N196
Kennewick, WA 99336
(509) 255-3442 | phone
2023 Sierra IP Law, PC - Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights - All Rights Reserved - Sitemap Privacy Lawyer Fresno, CA - Trademark Lawyer Modesto CA - Patent Lawyer Bakersfield, CA - Trademark Lawyer Bakersfield, CA - Patent Lawyer San Luis Obispo, CA - Trademark Lawyer San Luis Obispo, CA - Trademark Infringement Lawyer Tacoma WA - Internet Lawyer Bakersfield, CA - Trademark Lawyer Sacramento, CA - Patent Lawyer Sacramento, CA - Trademark Infringement Lawyer Sacrament CA - Patent Lawyer Tacoma WA - Intellectual Property Lawyer Tacoma WA - Trademark lawyer Tacoma WA - Portland Patent Attorney - Santa Barbara Patent Attorney - Santa Barbara Trademark Attorney