New Trademark Modernization Act will help Trademark Owners

Post By sierraiplawpc on December 30, 2020

Trademark Modernization Act passed as part of Consolidated Appropriations Act

On Sunday, December 27th, President Trump signed into law the Consolidated Appropriations Act for 2021. As part of the legislation, the Trademark Modernization Act (TMA) was passed as well. The TMA imposes several significant changes on US trademark law. The TMA is the most sweeping trademark legislation in decades and has several important features that trademark and business owners should note.

Two of the changes provide new and apparently more efficient tools for cleaning up the federal trademark register. First, the TMA allows third parties to initiate ex parte procedures (expungement or re-examination) to remove trademark registrations for marks that were never in proper use. This will allow persons and entities pursuing registration of their legitimate marks to clear out (1) zombie registrations for marks that are no longer in use and (2) faulty registrations for marks that were never properly in use. In particular, these tools will allow deserving trademark holders to remove foreign priority applications (Section 44 applications) that often create barriers to registration for domestic trademark applicants. Section 44 registrations do not require demonstration of use in commerce, and frequently include long lists of goods or services that will probably never be offered in marketplace. The TMA provides tools to address these unfortunate side effects of foreign-based registrations.

Second, the TMA allows third parties to intervene and submit evidence in a pending application to demonstrate that the application should be refused (e.g., because it is confusingly similar to intervener’s mark). This will allow those with legitimate prior rights to (1) intervene in a third party’s attempt to register a confusingly similar mark and (2) perhaps avoid the expense and delay of a formal opposition proceeding at the Trademark Trial and Appeals Board (TTAB).

Additionally, the TMA strengthens the legitimate trademark holder’s ability to police and enforce its rights by making injunctive relief more attainable. The TMA establishes a rebuttable presumption that a meritorious trademark plaintiff has sustained irreparable harm. This reverses a trend established by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in eBay v. MercExchange, 547 U.S. 388 (2006). Since the eBay case, it has become challenging for trademark plaintiffs to obtain an injunction. Under the TMA, plaintiffs who have successfully proven infringement or have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, will have an easier path to permanent and/or preliminary injunctions. This will increase the value and protection of trademark registrations and trademark rights generally, as the trademark holder will have much improved prospects of shutting down infringing use.

Finally, the TMA gives the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office director "the authority to reconsider, and modify or set aside, a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board." This change heads off a constitutional challenge to the appointment process for TTAB administrative law judges (ALJs) based on the Federal Circuit's decision in Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019). In Arthrex, the Federal Circuit found that the appointment of Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) ALJs by the Secretary of Commerce is unconstitutional because the PTAB ALJs are principal officers under the Appointments Clause. Principal officers must be appointed by the President. The Arthrex case is currently pending before the Supreme Court.

Sierra IP Law will advise and assist its clients in utilizing the new tools provided by the TMA to challenge unwarranted and abandoned trademark filings.


 

© 2020 Sierra IP Law. The information provided herein is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information that may be beneficial to the legal professional community, and should not be viewed as a substitute for legal consultation in a particular case.

2021 Sierra IP Law, PC - All Rights Reserved - Powered By Matador Solutions - Sitemap

Attorney Advertising

This Site may be considered advertising under the California Rules of Professional Responsibility. Sierra IP Law, PC does not seek to represent any person or entity based upon that person's or entity's viewing the Site (or any portion of the Site) in any jurisdiction where the Site (or any portion of the Site) does not comply with all of the laws and ethical requirements of that jurisdiction. Sierra IP Law's attorneys do not seek to practice law in jurisdictions where they are not properly authorized to practice. The various bar memberships of our attorneys are listed in each attorney's biography. The attorney who is responsible for this Site is Mark D. Miller in the Fresno office.

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram